Single article

DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2024-1-19-37

Romanycheva E.A., Pasynkov D.V., Egoshin I.A., Kolchev A.A., Merinov S.N., Busygina O.V., Nasrullayev M.N.

Automatic Identification of Isolated Calcifications and Their Accumulations on Mammograms

Keywords: breast cancer, mammography, calcifications, computer diagnostic system

Although microcalcinates usually are hyperattenuated, which makes them hyperintensive on mammograms, breast cancer is characterized by their small size, which, combined with the small size of their clusters, makes it difficult to identify them, especially against a dense background, which is often noted in fibrous changes in the breast parenchyma. The purpose of the study is to create and evaluate the effectiveness of the block for automatic identification of calcifications and their accumulations on mammograms. Material and methods. Mammograms of patients with suspicious (136 mammograms of 67 patients), as well as benign (299 mammograms of 151 patients) calcifications of various types were analyzed using a proprietary software package. Research results. After analyzing benign calcifications, the system marked all cases (100%) of calcified sediment, rod-shaped, vascular calcifications; 33 out of 36 (92.7%) cases of dystrophic, 66 out of 70 cases (94.3%) of rounded and 12 out of 15 (80%) cases of point calcifications in all patients; as well as 2 out of 3 cases of cutaneous calcifications in 1 out of 2 patients, 103 out of 106 (97.2%) cases of flaky calcifications in 51 out of 52 (98.1%) patients and 19 out of 22 cases (86.4%) of eggshell type calcifications in 10 out of 11 patients (90.9%). Among suspicious calcifications, the system marked 33 out of 39 cases (84.6%) of large heterogeneous calcifications, all 6 cases of small linear branching calcifications and 37 out of 39 (94.9%) cases of small polymorphic calcifications in all patients, as well as 30 out of 36 (83.3%) cases of amorphous calcifications in 15 out of 16 (93.7%) patients and 12 out of 16 (75.0%) cases of small linear calcifications in 6 out of 8 (75.0%) patients. All cases of unmarked suspicious calcifications corresponded to high-intensity soft-tissue shadows associated with indistinctly defined calcifications, which were labeled by the MammCheck II system previously developed by the authors. The frequency of false positive labels was 0.31 per mammogram. Conclusions. Benign calcifications were marked on 282 out of 299 images (94.3%) in 148 out of 151 (98.0%) patients, suspicious calcifications – on 118 out of 136 images (86.8%) in 64 out of 67 patients (95.5%).

References

  1. Gromov A.I., Komin Yu.A., Mozerov S.A., Krasnitskaya S.K. Ultrazvukovoi mertsayushchii artefakt v differentsialnoi diagnostike kaltsinatov molochnykh zhelez [Twinkling artifact in differential diagnosis of mammary calcinates]. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya, 2021, vol. 25, no.3, pp. 157– DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1025.
  1. Pasynkov D.V., Tukhbatullin M.G., Khasanov R.Sh. Komp’yuternyi analiz mammogramm nizkoi plotnosti: rezul’taty odnotsentrovogo prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya [The value of computer aided detection system for mammography in the fatty breast: the results of the single-centered, prospective, randomized clinical trial]. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya 2021, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 93– DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1040.
  2. Morozov S.P., Govorukhina V.G., Didenko V.V. et al. Perspektivy ispol’zovaniya tekhnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta (II) v skrininge raka molochnoi zhelezy [Prospect of application of artificial intelligence systems for breast cancer screening]. Voprosy onkologii, 2020, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 603–608. DOI: 10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-6-603-608.
  3. Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Shakhzadovaya A.O., eds. Sostoyanie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2019 godu [The oncology care for Russian population in 2019: state of the art. Mocow, MNIOI im. P.A. Gertzena]. Moscow, 2020, 239 p.
  4. Pasynkov D.V., Tukhbatullin M.G., Egoshin I.A. et al. Ul’trazvukovoi skrining raka molochnoi zhelezy pri mammograficheski plotnoi parenkhime: rol’ sistemy komp’yuternogo analiza mammogramm (odnotsentrovoe prospektivnoe randomizirovannoe klinicheskoe issledovanie) [Ultrasound breast cancer screening in dense parenchyma: the value of computer aided detection system for mammography (single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial)]. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 103–113. DOI: 10.21569/2222-7415-2021-11-1-103-113.
  5. Khasanov R.Sh., Tukhbatullin M.G., Pasynkov D.V. Effektivnost’ primeneniya sistemy komp’yuternogo analiza mammogramm pri skrininge raka molochnoi zhelezy: odnotsentrovoe, prospektivnoe, randomizirovannoe klinicheskoe issledovanie [The value of computer aided detection system for mammography in the breast cancer screening: single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial]. Voprosy onkologii, 2021, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 777–784. DOI: 10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-6-777-784.
  6. Pasynkov D.V., Egoshin I.A., Kolchev A.A. et al. Effektivnost’ sistemy komp’yuternogo analiza mammogramm v diagnostike variantov raka molochnoi zhelezy, trudno vyyavlyaemykh pri skriningovoi mammografii [The value of computer aided detection system in breast cancer difficult to detect at screening mammography]. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–118. DOI: 10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-2-107-118.
  7. Ali M.A., Czene K., Hall P., Humphreys K. Association of Microcalcification Clusters with Short-term Invasive Breast Cancer Risk and Breast Cancer Risk Factors. Rep., 2019, vol. 9(1), pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51186-w.
  8. Azam S., Eriksson M., Sjölander A., Gabrielson M. et al. Mammographic microcalcifications and risk of breast cancer. J. Cancer, 2021, vol. 125(5), pp. 759–765. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01459-x.
  9. Bennani-Baiti B., Baltzer P.A. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology, 2017, vol. 283(3), pp. 692–701. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161106.
  10. Boyd N.F., Martin L.J., Bronskill M. et al. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2010, vol. 102(16), pp. 1224–1237. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq239.
  11. Boyd N.F., Martin L.J., Yaffe M.J., Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res., 2011, vol. 13(6), p. 223. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2942.
  12. D’Orsi C.J., Sickles E.A., Mendelson E.B. et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, 2013, 224 p.
  13. Egoshin I., Pasynkov D., Kolchev A., Kliouchkin I. et al. A segmentation approach for mammoraphic images and its clinical value. IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Antennas, Communications and Electronic Systems (COMCAS), Tel-Aviv, Israel, 2017, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/COMCAS.2017.8244764.
  14. Ferreira V.C.C. de S., Etchebehere E.C.S. de C., Bevilacqua J.L.B., Barros N. De Suspicious amorphous microcalcifications detected on full-field digital mammography: correlation with histopathology. Bras., 2018, vol. 51(2), pp. 87-94. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0025.
  15. Hofvind S., Iversen B.F., Eriksen L. et al. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Acta Radiol., 2011, vol. 52(5), pp. 481–487. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100357.
  16. Lauby-Secretan B., Scoccianti C., Loomis D. et al. Breast-cancer screening – viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. Engl. J. Med., 2015, vol. 372(24), pp. 2353–2358. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363.
  17. Mayo R.C., Kent D., Sen L.C. et al. Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD. Digit. Imaging, 2019, vol. 32(4), pp. 618–624. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0168-6.
  18. Santos F., Moreira C., Nóbrega-Pereira S., Bernardes de Jesus B. New Insights into the Role of Epithelial⁻Mesenchymal Transition during Aging. J. Mol. Sci., 2019, vol. 20(4), p. 891. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20040891.
  19. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2021, vol. 71(3), pp. 209–249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
  20. Tagliafico A., Mariscotti G., Durando M. et al. Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of multicentre study. Radiol., 2015, vol. 25(1), pp. 9–14. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3402-8.
  21. Uematsu T., Kasami M., Yuen S. A cluster of microcalcifications: women with high risk for breast cancer versus other women. Breast Cancer, 2009, vol. 16(4), pp. 307–314. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0100-5.

About authors

Romanycheva Ekaterina A.
Radiologist, Radiology Department, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola (katerina.rrr@bk.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-092X)
Pasynkov Dmitry V.
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of Radiology Department, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola (passynkov@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-2307)
Egoshin Ivan A.
Junior Researcher, Scientific Sector, Mari State University, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola (jungl91@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-0734)
Kolchev Alexey A.
Candidate of Physics and Mathematics Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Radio Astronomy, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Russia, Kazan (kolchevaa@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-2558)
Merinov Sergei N.
Radiologist, Radiology Department, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola (xhafabayer@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5689-8815)
Busygina Olga V.
Radiologist, Radiology Department, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Russia, Yoshkar-Ola (busigina.olga@inbox.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-2217)
Nasrullayev Magomed N.
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Department of Surgery, Kazan State Medical Academy – Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Russia, Kazan (msh.avia@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-9372)

Article link

Romanycheva E.A., Pasynkov D.V., Egoshin I.A., Kolchev A.A., Merinov S.N., Busygina O.V., Nasrullayev M.N. Automatic Identification of Isolated Calcifications and Their Accumulations on Mammograms [Electronic resource] // Acta medica Eurasica. – 2024. – №1. P. 19-37. – URL: https://acta-medica-eurasica.ru/en/single/2024/1/3/. DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2024-1-19-37.