Single article

DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2023-2-101-113

Andronnikov E.A., Diomidova V.N., Nikolaev N.S., Drandrov R.N., Gogulina N.V.

Informative value of radiological methods for diagnosing subacromial impingement syndrome

Keywords: radiation diagnostics, impingement syndrome, shoulder joint, subacromial fibrosis, rotator cuff, etiopathogenetic factors, anatomical structure of the shoulder joint

Up to 30% of the adult population suffers from impingement syndrome with severe pain. Detection of the disease in the early stages is difficult. Early diagnosis of the initial signs of degenerative changes in the subacromial space saves the patient from surgery and additional risk of postoperative complications. The aim of the study is to evaluate the informative value of radiation methods for diagnosing subacromial impingement syndrome based on the analysis of papers published by domestic and foreign authors, depending on etiopathogenetic factors and anatomical structure of the shoulder joint. Materials and methods. The authors analyzed Russian and foreign publications on anatomical, etiological, pathogenetic, clinical, diagnostic features of subacromial conflict syndrome from databases: e-library (https://www.elibrary.ru), Oxford Medicine Online (https://academic.oup.com /), PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and others. The applied research methods were analysis and synthesis, axiomatic method and abstraction. Results. The development of subacromial impingement syndrome was revealed to be due to the structural features of the shoulder joint, which differs from other joints in anatomical and functional complexity. At this, changes in the rotator cuff of the shoulder joint develop under the influence of various etiopathogenetic factors, which can be both external (a decrease in subacromial space, an increase in the volume of the coracoacromial arch, instability, overload of the shoulder joint) and internal (changes in vascularization, pathology of collagen fibers' microstructure, degeneration of the tendons in the rotator cuff, etc.) Currently there is no unified approach to the algorithm of radiation diagnosing the early signs of impingement syndrome and injuries to the rotator cuff of the shoulder joint. Although radiography is a simple and informative method to assess the condition of the shoulder joint, its sensitivity at an early stage of impingement syndrome is insufficient. Magnetic resonance imaging is highly informative and sensitive in the diagnosis of injuries to the rotator cuff of the shoulder joint, however, it has a number of limitations, such as the presence of some contraindications, its high cost, protracted examination time, etc. Ultrasound examination is currently considered the preferred method in the diagnosis of impingement syndrome due to its high informative value, speed of execution and the possibility of its repeatability. Conclusions. The analysis of the informative value of radiation diagnostics methods showed that in identifying the early signs of subacromial impingement syndrome, taking into account etiopathogenetic factors and the anatomical structure of the shoulder joint, the ultrasound method is optimal and preferable; for more complex and controversial cases, according to certain indications, they are the methods of X-ray computer and magnetic resonance imaging. In the absence of the possibility of using high-tech diagnostic methods, classical radiography of the shoulder joint is performed.

References

  1. Aliev R.A., Akhpashev A.A., Zvezdkina E.A. Kriterii MRTdiagnostiki plechevogo sustava pri adgezivnom kapsulite [Criteria for MRI diagnostics of the shoulder joint in adhesive capsulitis]. Travma 2018: mul’tidistsiplinarnyy podkhod: sb. tezisov Mezhdunar. konf. [Proc. of Int. Sci. Conf. «Trauma 2018: a multidisciplinary approach»]. Moscow, 2018, p. 19.
  2. Barulin A.E., Kurushina O.V., Dumtsev V.V. Bol’ v pleche [Shoulder pain]. Meditsinskiy Sovet, 2017, no. 20, 50–54. DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-20-50-54.
  3. Vasil’eva L.N. Tekhnicheskiy potentsial ul’trazvukovoy diagnostiki v meditsine [Technical potential of ultrasound diagnostics in medicine]. Problemy nauchnogo i vnenauchnogo poznaniya: sb. nauch. st. kafedry filosofii, sotsiologii i pedagogiki [Problems of scientific and non-scientific knowledge: Sat. scientific articles of the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Pedagogy]. Cheboksary, Chuvash State University Publ., 2022, 11, pp. 165–172.
  4. Emel’yanenko M.V. Optimizatsiya algoritma diagnostiki i monitoringa lecheniya patsientov s patologicheskimi izmeneniyami sukhozhiliya nadostnoy myshtsy pri subakromial’nom impidzhment syndrome: … сand. med. nauk. [Optimization of the algorithm for diagnosing and monitoring the treatment of patients with pathological changes in the supraspinatus tendon in subacromial impingement syndrome: Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2018, 155 p.
  5. Emel’yanenko M.V., Lazko F.L., Gazhonova V.E. Validatsiya russkoyazychnoy shkaly-oprosnika urovnya boli v plechevom sustave dlya vyyavleniya patsientov s subakromial’nym impidzhment-sindromom [Validation of the Russian-language scale-questionnaire of the level of pain in the shoulder joint to identify patients with subacromial impingement syndrome]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii, 2018, 24, no. 2., pp. 80–94. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-2-80-94.
  6. Kazakova S.S., Rudnov A.V., Bobrovskaya E.V. MPT i KT v diagnostike ossifitsiruyushchego kapsulita plechevogo sustava. Klinicheskiy sluchay [MPT and CT in the diagnosis of ossifying capsulitis of the shoulder joint. Clinical case]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 5. Available at: www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29175 (Accessed Date 2023, Juny 5).
  7. Kormilina A.R. Mul’tiparametricheskoe ul’trazvukovoe issledovanie pri perelomakh dlinnykh trubchatykh kostey: … сand. med. nauk. [Multiparametric ultrasound examination for fractures of long tubular bones: Cand. Diss.]. Kazan, 2021, 123 p.
  8. Kutya S.A., Tkach A.V. Funktsional’naya anatomiya plechevogo sustava v norme i pri povrezhdenii vrashchatel’noy manzhety [Functional anatomy of the shoulder joint in normal conditions and with damage to the rotator cuff]. Krymskiy zhurnal eksperimental’noy i klinicheskoy meditsiny, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 61–67.
  9. Nikolaev A.V. Topograficheskaya anatomiya i operativnaya khirurgiya. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. [Topographic anatomy and operative surgery: textbook. 3rd]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2015, 736 p.
  10. Egiazaryan K.A., Lazishvili G.D., Rat’ev A.P. et al. Operativnoe lechenie povrezhdeniy vrashchatel’noy manzhety plechevogo sustava [Surgical treatment of damage to the rotator cuff of the shoulder joint]. Kafedra travmatologii i ortopedii, 2017, 28, no. 2, pp. 15–18.
  11. Men’shova D.V., Ponomarenko N.S., Kuklin I.A. et al. Otsenka effektivnosti khirurgicheskogo lecheniya patsientov s massivnymi razryvami sukhozhiliy vrashchatel’noy manzhety plecha s ispol’zovaniem transpozitsii sukhozhiliya shirochayshey myshtsy spiny [Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with massive ruptures of the tendons of the rotator cuff of the shoulder using transposition of the tendon of the latissimus dorsi]. Acta Biomedica Scientifica, 2022, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 250–257.
  12. Shostak N.A., Pravdyuk N.G., Timofeev V.T. et al. Patologiya plechevogo sustava i myagkikh tkaney: klinicheskie varianty, sovremennye vozmozhnosti patogeneticheskoy terapii [Pathology of the shoulder joint and soft tissues: clinical options, modern possibilities of pathogenetic therapy]. Klinitsist, 2021, vol. 15(1–4), pp. 47–54.
  13. Samartsev I.N., Zhivolupov S.A., Emelin A.Yu. et al. Sovremennye predstavleniya o differentsial’noy diagnostike i lechenii patsientov s bol’yu v oblasti plecha [Modern concepts of differential diagnosis and treatment of patients with shoulder pain]. RMZh, 2017, vol. 25, 9, pp. 564–571.
  14. Men’shova D.V., Kuklin I.A., Ponomarenko N.S. et al. Sposob lecheniya patsientov s massivnymi razryvami vrashchatel’noy manzhety plecha: klinicheskiy sluchay [A method of treating patients with massive ruptures of the rotator cuff: a clinical case]. Klinicheskaya praktika, 2022, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 89–94.
  15. Andronnikov E.A., Diomidova V.N., Drandrov R.N. et al. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika subakromial’nogo fibroza u patsientov s sindromom ushchemleniya rotatornoy manzhety plecha [Ultrasound diagnosis of subacromial fibrosis in patients with rotator cuff impingement syndrome]. Acta medica Eurasica, 2023, 1, pp. 11–18. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://acta-medica-eurasica.ru/single/2023/1/2. (Accessed 05 June. 2023). DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2023-1-11-18.
  16. Filimonova A.M. Vozmozhnosti magnitno-rezonansnoy tomografii i magnitno-rezonansnoy artrografii v diagnostike povrezhdeniy plechevogo sustava: avtoref. dis. … cand. med. nauk. [Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography in the diagnosis of injuries of the shoulder joint: Abstract of the Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2015, 22 p.
  17. Akhtar M., Karimi H., Gilani S.A. et al. The effectiveness of routine physiotherapy with and without neuromobilization in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Pak Med Assoc, 2020, vol.70(12(B)), pp. 2322–2327. DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.918.
  18. AlAnazi A., Alghadir A.H., Gabr S.A. Handgrip Strength Exercises Modulate Shoulder Pain, Function, and Strength of Rotator Cuff Muscles of Patients with Primary Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. Biomed Res In, 2022, vol. 30, 9151831. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9151831.
  19. Balke M., Liem D., Greshake O. et al. Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(7), pp. 2200-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3499-y. Epub 2014 Dec 30. PMID: 25547273.
  20. Bashir S., Syed R.F., Firdose Kamal Y. et al. Correlation between high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research, 2014, no. 4, pp. 103–112.
  21. Bertoni L., Jacquet-Guibon S., Branly T. et al. An experimentally induced osteoarthritis model in horses performed on both metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints: Technical, clinical, imaging, biochemical, macroscopic and microscopic characterization. PLoS One, 2020, 15(6), e0235251. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235251. PMID: 32584901; PMCID: PMC7316256.
  22. Cherchi L., Ciornohac J.F., Godet J. et al. Critical shoulder angle: Measurement reproducibility and correlation with rotator cuff tendon tears. Traumatol: Surg. & Res, 2016, vol. 10(5), pp. 559–562.
  23. Creech J.A., Silver S. Shoulder Impingement Syndrome. 2022 Apr 21. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. PMID: 32119405.
  24. Daggett M., Werner B., Collin P. et al. Correlation between glenoid inclination and critical shoulder angle: a radiographic and computed tomography study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(12), pp. 1948–1953. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Sep 6. PMID: 26350880.
  25. Desmeules F., Minville L., Riederer B. et al. Acromio-humeral distance variation measured by ultrasonography and its association with the outcome of rehabilitation for shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin J Sport Med, 2004, 14(4), pp. 197–205. DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200407000-00002. PMID: 15273525.
  26. Garving C., Jakob S., Bauer I. et al. Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder. Dtsch Arztebl Int., 2017, vol. 114(45), pp. 765–776. DOI: 3238/arztebl.2017.0765.
  27. Görmeli C., Görmeli G., Yücesoy C. et al. Comparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon rupture. Ann Saudi Med, 2014 34(6), pp. 522–526. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.522. PMID: 25971827. PMCID: PMC6074584.
  28. Heron S.R., Woby S.R., Thompson D.P. Comparison of three types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy/shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy, 2017, vol. 103(2), pp. 167–173. DOI: 1016/j.physio.2016.09.001.
  29. Jensen J., Kristensen M.T., Bak L. et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder; correlation with arthroscopy. Acta Radiol Open. 2021, vol. 10(11), 20584601211062059. DOI: 10.1177/20584601211062059. PMID: 34881048. PMCID: PMC8646798.
  30. Kaplan R.M., Hays R.D. Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022, 43, pp. 355-373. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052120-012811. Epub 2021 Dec 9. PMID: 34882431.
  31. Karuppaiah K., Sinha J. Scaffolds in the management of massive rotator cuff tears: current concepts and literature review. EFORT Open Rev, 2019, vol. 4(9), pp. 557–566. DOI: https://doi.org/1302/2058-5241.4.180040.
  32. Lin D.J., Wong T.T., Kazam J.K. Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead-Throwing Athlete: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Injury, and Imaging Findings. Radiology, 2018, vol. 286(2), pp. 370–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170481.
  33. Moor B.K., Bouaicha S., Rothenfluh D.A. et al. Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint? A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Jt J., 2013, 95-B(7), pp. 935–941.
  34. Moor B.K., Wieser K., Slankamenac K. et al. Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg., 2014, 23(4), pp. 536–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.008. Epub 2014 Jan 28. PMID: 24480324.
  35. Oserowsky A., Layfield L.J., Crim J. Post-arthrogram synovitis: MRI and histopathologic find Skeletal Radiol., 2022, vol. 51(1), pp. 219–223. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03877-7. Epub 2021 Jul 31. PMID: 34331550.
  36. Pekyavas N.O., Ergun N. Comparison of virtual reality exergaming and home exercise programs in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and scapular dyskinesis: Short term effect. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2017, vol. 51(3), pp. 238–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.03.008.
  37. Randhawa S., Garvin G., Roth M. et al. Maigne Syndrome – A potentially treatable yet underdiagnosed cause of low back pain: A review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2022, vol. 35(1), pp. 153–159. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200297.
  38. Rutten M.J., Collins J.M., de Waal Malefijt M. et al. Unsuspected sonographic findings in patients with posttraumatic shoulder complaints. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2010, vol. 38(9), pp. 457–465. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20745. PMID: 20848574.
  39. Saracoglu I., Emuk Y., Taspinar F. Does taping in addition to physiotherapy improve the outcomes in subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract, 2018, vol. 34(4), pp. 251–263. DOI: 1080/09593985.2017.1400138.
  40. Spiegl U.J., Horan M.P., Smith S.W. et al. The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, vol. 24(7), pp. 2244–2251. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3587-7. Epub 2015 Mar 29. PMID: 25820655.
  41. Terrell S.L., Olson G.E., Lynch J. Therapeutic Exercise Approaches to Nonoperative and Postoperative Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. J Athl Train, 2021, vol. 56(1), pp. 31–45. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0488.19.
  42. Thamyongki S., Wanitchanont T., Chulsomlee K. et al. The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale: translation, reliability and validation of a Thai version of UCLA shoulder scale in rotator cuff tear patients. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022, vol. 23(1), p. 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05018-0.
  43. Zoga A.C., Kamel S.I., Hynes J.P. et al. The Evolving Roles of MRI and Ultrasound in First-Line Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2021, 217(6), pp. 1390–1400. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.25606. Epub 2021 Jun 23. PMID: 34161130.

About authors

Andronnikov Evgenii A.
Head of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty, Russia, Cheboksary (andronnikovevgenij@mail.ru; )
Diomidova Valentina N.
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases with a Course of Radiation Diagnostics, Chuvash State University; Head of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, City Clinical Hospital № 1, Russia, Cheboksary (diomidovavn@rambler.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-7971)
Nikolaev Nikolai S.
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Physician, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty; Head of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Extreme Medicine, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (nikolaevns@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-470X)
Drandrov Rodion N.
Doctor of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty, Russia, Cheboksary (rdrandrov@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-9932)
Gogulina Natal’ya V.
Radiologist, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty, Russia, Cheboksary (fc@orthoscheb.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-7406)

Article link

Andronnikov E.A., Diomidova V.N., Nikolaev N.S., Drandrov R.N., Gogulina N.V. Informative value of radiological methods for diagnosing subacromial impingement syndrome [Electronic resource] // Acta medica Eurasica. – 2023. – №2. P. 101-113. – URL: https://acta-medica-eurasica.ru/en/single/2023/2/10/. DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2023-2-101-113.