Single article

DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2025-1-13-20
Full article

UDC: 616.62-003.7-073.43
BBC: Р696.504.3-439

Diomidova V.N., Pavlov E.N., Voitko D.A., Zhuravleva N.V.

Informative and diagnostic value of ultrasound twinkle artifact in verification of  urinary stones

Keywords: ultrasound examination, twinkle artifact, urolithiasis, kidneys, urinary tract

In cases of small urinary calculi (less than 5 mm) in the seroscale ultrasound examination mode, differential diagnosis between the suspected renal calculus and hyperechoic foci caused by other factors (vascular or parenchymal) is difficult. On the back of this, it is important to find an additional diagnostic ultrasound criterion for reliable visualization of calculi in the urinary tract. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the informative value and diagnostic significance of the ultrasound twinkle artifact in verifying small urinary calculi. Material and methods. The study included 100 patients with urolithiasis and 25 healthy adults. Patients with urolithiasis were divided into two groups (N 1 and N 2 with an equal number of patients in them), healthy individuals made up group N 3. All persons included in the study underwent ultrasound examination in B-mode and color Doppler mapping of the urinary system organs, multispiral computed tomography without contrast enhancement of the abdominal cavity and the retroperitoneal space. Equipment used: ultrasonic scanners with a convex sensor (2.5–5.0 MHz, Mindray MX7, China; Philips, Holland; Toshiba, Japan) and a Siemens SOMATOM Drive 2´128 computed tomograph (Siemens Healthineers, Germany). The ultrasound twinkle artifact was analyzed as a diagnostic criterion in verifying urinary tract calculi with a size of less than 5 mm. Results. Patients in group 1 first underwent native multispiral computed tomography, then ultrasound kidneys examination was performed for those of them who had stones in the urinary tract to identify the twinkle artifact. Multispiral computed tomography made it possible to identify 108 urinary stones in patients of this group. With the help of ultrasound examination in B-mode, conducted in patients selected according to the results of multispiral computed tomography, 71 concretions were recorded, in color Doppler mapping mode – the flicker artifact was present in 142 cases. Patients in group 2 first underwent ultrasound examination of the kidneys and the urinary tract with special settings to detect the flicker artifact, followed by multispiral computed tomography of the abdominal cavity and the retroperitoneal space without contrast enhancement. With the help of ultrasound examination conducted in B-mode, 35 urinary stones were found in patients of this group. When using the color Doppler mapping mode with additional settings and registration of the flicker artifact, 68 more calculi were found in the urinary tract. Purposefully performed multispiral computed tomography of the kidneys confirmed calculi in all 68 cases in different parts of the urinary tract recorded during ultrasound examination. At this, 4 patients were diagnosed to have multiple (up to 7) urinary calculi. The analysis of using the flicker artifact as an ultrasound criterion in detecting urinary calculi showed a high informative value of ultrasound examination with additional settings (sensitivity and specificity – 94.4% and 100%, respectively). According to the results of the study, it can be assumed that the flicker artifact during ultrasound examination in the color Doppler mapping mode is a diagnostic feature (criterion), and not an "artifact". Conclusion. The use of the flicker artifact as an additional criterion to the standard ultrasound examination of the kidneys and the urinary tract gave the opportunity to improve the diagnosis of small urinary stones. At this, the informative value of ultrasound examination with additional settings for the flicker artifact reached 94.4% in sensitivity, and the specificity reached 100%.

References

  1. Gromov A.I., Sapozhnikov O.A., Kaprin A.D. Doplerovskii artefakt mertsaniya: fizicheskie mekhanizmy i mesto v diagnosticheskoĭ praktike. Sovremennoe sostoyanie voprosa [Doppler twinkling artifact: physical mechanisms and place in diagnostic practice. State of the art]. Medical Visualization, 2023, vol. 27(1), pp. 120-134. DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1206.
  2. Leonov D.V., Kulberg N.S., Gromov A.I. et al. Causes of Ultrasound Doppler Twinkling Artifact. Acoustical Physics, 2018, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 105–114. DOI: 10.1134/S1063771018010128.
  3. Adel H., Sattar A., Rahim A. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Twinkling Artifact for Identifying Urinary Tract Calculi. Cureus., 2019, vol. 11(9), e5647. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5647.
  4. Brisbane W., Bailey M.R., Sorensen M.D. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol., 2016, vol. 13(11), pp. 654–662. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154.
  5. Brisbane W., Bailey M.R., Sorensen M.D. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol., 2016, vol. 13(11), pp. 654–662. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154.
  6. Drudi F.M., Maroncelli R., Angelini F. et al. Unusual application of twinkling artifact. J Ultrasound., 2024, vol. 27(4), pp. 1003–1007. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-023-00861-w.
  7. Fontenelle L.F., Sarti T.D. Kidney Stones: Treatment and Prevention. Am Fam Physician, 2019, vol. 99(8), pp. 490–496.
  8. Gliga M.L., Chirila C.N., Podeanu D.M. et al. Twinkle, twinkle little stone: an artifact improves the ultrasound performance! Med Ultrason., 2017, vol. 19(3), pp. 272–275. DOI: 10.11152/mu-984.
  9. Letafati M., Kazem M., Parisa T. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Twinkling Artifact Sign Seen in Color Doppler Ultrasonography in Detecting Microlithiasis of Kidney. Nephro-Urology Monthly, 2020, 12(2), e102860. DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.102860.
  10. Mathews J.D., Forsythe A.V., Brady Z. et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million. Australians BMJ, 2013, vol. 346, f2360. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2360.
  11. Nabheerong P., Kengkla K., Saokaew S., Naravejsakul K. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler twinkling artifact for identifying urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound., 2023, vol. 26(2), pp. 321–331. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00759-z.
  12. Sharma G., Sharma A. Clinical implications and applications of the twinkling sign in ureteral calculus: a preliminary study. J Urol., 2013, vol. 189(6), pp. 2132–2135. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.176.
  13. Turrin A., Minola P., Costa F. et al. Diagnostic value of colour Doppler twinkling artefact in sites negative for stones on B mode renal sonography. Urol Res., 2007, vol.35(6), pp. 313–31 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-007-0110-8.
  14. Vallone G., Napolitano G., Fonio P. et al.US detection of renal and ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic. Crit Ultrasound J., 2013, vol. 5(1), S3. DOI: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-S1-S3.
  15. Van Kolfschoten T., Parfitt S.A., Serangeli J., Bello S.M. Lower Paleolithic bone tools from the “Spear Horizon” at Schöningen (Germany). Journal of Human Evolution, 2015, vol. 89, pp. 226–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.012.
  16. Yavuz A., Ceken K., Alimoglu E., Kabaalioglu A. The reliability of color Doppler “twinkling” artifact for diagnosing millimetrical nephrolithiasis: comparison with B-Mode US and CT scanning results. JMed Ultrason (2001), 2015, vol. 42(2), pp. 215–222. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-014-0599-8.
  17. Zhang X., Zhang G., Xu L. et al. Application of deep learning reconstruction of ultra-low-dose abdominal CT in the diagnosis of renal calculi. Insights Imaging, 2022, vol. 13, Article 163. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01300-w.

About authors

Diomidova Valentina N.
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases with a Course of Radiation Diagnostics, Chuvash State University; Head of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, City Clinical Hospital № 1, Russia, Cheboksary (diomidovavn@rambler.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-7971)
Pavlov Evgeny N.
Chief Urologist, Ministry of Health of the Chuvash Republic; Urologist, Department of Urology, Republican Clinical Hospital, Russia, Cheboksary (Pavloven1978@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9347-4105)
Voitko Dmitry A.
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Urolithiasis, N.A. Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Russia, Moscow (1987vda@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1651)
Zhuravleva Nadezhda V.
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases, Chuvash State University; Leading Expert, Chuvashia Med Insurance Company JSC, Russia, Cheboksary (zhuravlevanv@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6470-7724)

Article link

Diomidova V.N., Pavlov E.N., Voitko D.A., Zhuravleva N.V. Informative and diagnostic value of ultrasound twinkle artifact in verification of  urinary stones [Electronic resource] // Acta medica Eurasica. – 2025. – №1. P. 13-20. – URL: https://acta-medica-eurasica.ru/en/single/2025/1/2/. DOI: 10.47026/2413-4864-2025-1-13-20.

Menu

Journal numbers

Archive for year 2025
Archive for year 2024
Archive for year 2023
Archive for year 2022
Archive for year 2021
Archive for year 2020
Archive for year 2019
Archive for year 2018
Archive for year 2017
Archive for year 2016
Archive for year 2015